top of page

La Mort de Notre Voix; Salut Hebdo.

12 dead – 2 of whom were policemen. 11 critically injured. These were the figures

released by most news stations worldwide, regarding the recent terrorist attack on the

offices of the satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo, in Paris. And it was in this selfsame city,

just over two centuries ago, that citizens rioted and overthrew one of the most

powerful monarchies in Europe, in order to obtain a tentative taste of freedom, which

they as human beings, righteously deserved – and still deserve today.

And the freedoms being targeted at this point are indeed those of speech and expression,

freedoms which most people, being numbed by the comfort and leisure afforded by a

democratic society, often fail to appreciate and occasionally exploit for the wrong

reasons. This gutsy publication, in particular, was no stranger to the creation of scandals,

having been criticized by many and having even previously fallen victim to a deliberate

office fire, which by some sheer stroke of luck, injured no one. But did they ever think of

backing down? Did such an attack silence the courageous few that kept on pushing to

express the ideas everyone thought of but feared to make public? Hell no. The editor

himself beautifully put forward this notion: I’d rather die standing than live on my

knees – a quote which was unfortunately, brought to reality, having been one of the

victims of the attack himself.

Why is it that just because one criticises their set of beliefs and principles, should they

believe it to be a glorifying act to just halt the lives of innocents that had so much going

on for them? What right do they have to impose themselves on others and to play God and

decide whether a person lives or dies? Correct. They had absolutely no right. The victims’

families must be absolutely distraught, for one. Secondly, it was an absolute waste of

individualistic talent that brought something unique and productive into the world,

through their actions. Being a journalist is not an easy task, especially one that reports

news, with his life being in constant risk, from war-ridden countries. But being shot down

in the city you called home, in sheer cold-blood, point-blank, where the odds of it

happening were so small, is a completely different story – a chilling and horrifying one to

be exact. I think, that the absolute fact that such an organised attack happened in a

country such as France, which is a prime example of a thriving democracy, brought most

people face to face, with the horrible reality that tyranny and extremism will still

inadvertently trickle into the cracks in the foundation of such a society. Unfortunately,

such cracks will appear in even the most stable of structures.

Being an editor myself, albeit one related to a school newspaper, I physically reacted by

jumping in my seat, whenever I heard the gun shots while watching the videos. Journalism

has always personally interested me, as a side-profession, but after seeing such an event

taking place I, without wanting to, suddenly feel restricted and terrified at the prospect

of being silenced in order to preserve my life and that of each of my family members, in a

democratic country, idealised to be safe from such discrimination.

But as Gandhi so rightly put it, I must be the change I want to see in the world. The first

step to recovery is always perceiving the problem and understanding it and I believe that

journalism is an excellent route to that. Journalism would be for nought, had it never

been used to reveal scandals or critical issues and propose ideas for the bettering of

society. It is an excellent weapon, when used properly, utilized by democracies in order to

safeguard rights and encourage public participation – elements a democracy thrives upon,

which will ultimately lead to the propagation of true freedom.

My eternal admiration will forever rest upon those brave enough to speak out and open

their minds to the world around them, especially people that have actually given up their lives for the truth. These artists have left behind legacies related to the conquest of

liberty, which fortunately, these terrorists failed to apprehend. Their plot has been foiled.

They have not succeeded in generating fear and silence. Oh, on the contrary, every single

journalist yearns to write about such a pressing matter as this. They have simply lit a fuse

to a bomb of words within every single writer who is now dying to get started on

criticizing them and calling out their extremist attitudes. So essentially, the scores are

now as follows: Journalists – 1: Terrorists – 0. They lose.

Denise Gatt, Editor

Animation - Abigail Agius

10927622_762906953800033_590018405_o.jpg

Featured Posts
Recent Posts
Archive
Search By Tags
Follow Us
bottom of page